10 Reasons Why People Actually Don't Like Islam

 Islamic apologists try to silence critics of Islam (an ideology, not a live human being) by throwing the accusation that they hate Muslims. First off, Islam is not a human being. While there are individuals who hate Muslims, that's not always the case. Free From Religious Harm does not condone nor take part in hating Muslims nor any other group of people, as they are human beings.

Rather, we hate the teachings in the Islamic sources and work to expose the teachings. Critics of Islam have helped former adherents of Islam to leave the religion. Those who leave Islam are faced with harsh treatment from their friends and family members who are still following Islam. But those apostates receive better treatment from those who reject the religion.

That being said, the reasons people hate the religion of Islam are not what apologists will try to tell you. The reasons people hate this religion include:

1. Islam calls for the violent subjugation of the entire world: The Islamic sources are filled with dark, cruel histories of violent raids and tyrannical authoritarianism. The Quran was tricky with this one, starting off peaceful when adherents of Islam were outnumbered, then went to defensive violence when their numbers grew, then went to offensive violence when they outnumbered everyone else and their army was more powerful.

One Quranic example from the era when the adherents of Islam were outnumbered is in chapter 109 of the Quran, containing only 6 verses, and which was written in Mecca before Islam took power, says:

"Say, 'O disbelievers. I do not worship what you worship. Nor do you worship what I worship. Nor do I serve what you serve. Nor do you serve what I serve. You have your way, and I have my way."

This passage took place before the adherents of Islam had the means to fight. After Islam gathered more followers through the promises it gave to them, defensive combat began. In chapter 2, verses 190-194 says about fighting:

"And fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not commit aggression; Allah does not love the aggressors. And kill them wherever you overtake them, and expel them from where they had expelled you. Oppression is more serious than murder. But do not fight them at the Sacred Mosque, unless they fight you there. If they fight you, then kill them. Such is the retribution of the disbelievers. But if they cease, then Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. And fight them until there is no oppression, and worship becomes devoted to Allah alone. But if they cease, then let there be no hostility except against the oppressors. The sacred month for the sacred month; and sacrilege calls for retaliation. Whoever commits aggression against you, retaliate against him in the same measure as he has committed against you. And be conscious of Allah, and know that Allah is with the righteous."

Even in this passage during the era of defensive fighting in Islam, we can already see it getting ugly. The above passage was written after the Muslims were expelled from Mecca after Muhammad kept antagonizing the polytheists (events which will be discussed in another article). In the above passage, the author of the Quran wanted Muslims to fight those who started a fight with them, but to not do anything more than what was done to them.

Even though it was defensive, the passage still made it clear that Islam was meant to rule over everything else, due to the words "And fight them until there is no oppression, and worship becomes devoted to Allah alone." The Quran equates not worshipping Allah to being oppression, and therefore orders all worship to be for "Allah alone".

After Islam's numbers grew, it became less of a defensive force and more of a totalitarianistic offensive force. One of many examples in the Quran is found in chapter 9, verses 28-29: "O you who believe! The polytheists are polluted, so let them not approach the Sacred Mosque after this year of theirs. And if you fear poverty, Allah will enrich you from His grace, if He wills. Allah is Aware and Wise. Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, nor abide by the religion of truth—from among those who received the Scripture—until they pay the due tax, willingly or unwillingly."

The above verses were written after Islam grew strong enough to conquer Mecca. After the conquest of Mecca, non-Muslims were not allowed to enter Mecca. This wasn't limited to only the aggressors, but it applied to everyone who didn't accept Islam. Adherents of Judaism and Christianity were given the choice to either convert, pay Jiziya, leave their homes and never return, or die. Everyone else, including Atheists, agnostics, polytheists, Hindus, Buddhists, people in the spiritual but not religious community, and everyone else was ordered to convert or be killed. They didn't have the option to pay half their salary to live where Islam's armies invaded.

Going further, after Muhammad's death (if the histories even happened), the hadith, Sahih Al-Bukhari 6924, 6925 says "Narrated Abu Huraira: 'When the Prophet
died and Abu Bakr became his successor and some of the Arabs reverted to disbelief, `Umar said, "O Abu Bakr! How can you fight these people although Allah's Messenger said, 'I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, 'and whoever said, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', Allah will save his property and his life from me, unless (he does something for which he receives legal punishment) justly, and his account will be with Allah?' "Abu Bakr said, "By Allah! I will fight whoever differentiates between prayers and Zakat as Zakat is the right to be taken from property (according to Allah's Orders). By Allah! If they refused to pay me even a kid they used to pay to Allah's Messenger, I would fight with them for withholding it." `Umar said, "By Allah: It was nothing, but I noticed that Allah opened Abu Bakr's chest towards the decision to fight, therefore I realized that his decision was right."

The most damaging Hadith is Sahih Al-Bukhari 123: "A man came to the Prophet and asked, "O Allah's Messenger! What kind of fighting is in Allah's cause? (I ask this), for some of us fight because of being enraged and angry and some for the sake of his pride and haughtiness." The Prophet raised his head (as the questioner was standing) and said, "He who fights so that Allah's Word (Islam) **should be superior**, then he fights in Allah's cause."

Islam's goal was not peaceful. This Hadith took place when Islam was strong enough to conquer and subjugate. A lot of people in those days converted through force, and they stayed in the religion through fear of being killed if they left. That brings us to reason #2 in this article.

2. People hate Islam because it orders the killing of apostates: Apologists for Islam will try to say that this command was only for the times when Muslims were being attacked and that it only included those who left and helped the enemies attack the Muslims. This, however, is false. In Sahih Al-Bukhari 7157, we read of an incident: "Narrated Abu Musa: 'A man embraced Islam and then reverted back to Judaism. Mu`adh bin Jabal came and saw the man with Abu Musa. Mu`adh asked, "What is wrong with this (man)?" Abu Musa replied, "He embraced Islam and then reverted back to Judaism." Mu`adh said, "I will not sit down unless you kill him (as it is) the verdict of Allah and His Apostle."

This man reverted back to his old religion. This was when there was no conflict. And yet, he was killed anyway, and he clearly didn't pose a threat. Muhammad's order to kill apostates can be found in the Hadith Sunan an-Nasa'i 4064: ‏ ‏‏"It was narrated from Anas that : Ibn 'Abbas said: "The Messenger of Allah said: 'Whoever changes his religion, kill him.'"

That command is clear as day. It mentioned nothing about them starting a fight. Rather, it was based strictly on belief, and it has been going on for over 1400 years now. Former Muslims are faced with a death warrant every day. If they grew up in a country where Islam rules, and they are living in a country that protects them, they are unable to visit their loved ones. How can they? They'll be killed if they try.

Apologists will get desperate and try to cover this up. Perhaps it's time to read the sources themselves instead of running to apologists for a feel-good cover up explanation. The sources are clear. It leaves no room for lies and rationalizations. After all, there are innocent people dying everyday because of the Quran and the Hadiths and their clear teachings. Perhaps it's time to stop keeping it under wraps and start thinking about the people who are being impacted by it.

3. Islam's influence is still taking place in the world: Apologists have tried to keep this under wraps as well. They try to say that the Quran doesn't condone terrorism. They try to quote early Quran verses in an attempt to say that Islam is peaceful. As we already stated above, the Quran was not written in the order that it is currently compiled. Rather, it was first written, and then it was compiled from the longest chapters to the shortest chapters except for Sura al-Fatiha, the first chapter.

You can find the order in which the verses were written here: https://tanzil.net/docs/revelation_order

When an apologist tries to quote a peaceful verse, really do some research. Chances are, they are quoting a verse from the days when adherents of Islam were outnumbered and therefore had to remain peaceful so they wouldn't be wiped out. Reading the verses that took place after Islam rose in power, you'll see that it has a conquer-and-subjugate mentality.

From what we've seen earlier in this article, Muhammad was ordered to fight the unbelievers until they convert and pay the Islamic tax (zakat). Then we've seen that they are going to be violently forced to continue in it. Gotta rake in the money, huh? Then if they leave the religion, they'll be killed. If they leave, it'll risk more adherents abandoning Islam, which begins weakening Islam's numbers. Islam will lose its power grip. After all, the adherents of Islam were ordered to fight and subjugate the rest of the world, a command that was meant for all time as we can see in Sahih Al-Bukhari 1834: "On the day of the conquest of Mecca, the Prophet said, "There is no more emigration (from Mecca) but Jihad and intentions, and whenever you are called for Jihad, you should go immediately. No doubt, Allah has made this place (Mecca) a sanctuary since the creation of the heavens and the earth and will remain a sanctuary till the Day of Resurrection as Allah has ordained its sanctity. Fighting was not permissible in it for anyone before me, and even for me it was allowed only for a portion of a day. So, it is a sanctuary with Allah's sanctity till the Day of Resurrection. Its thorns should not be uprooted and its game should not be chased; and its luqata (fallen things) should not be picked up except by one who would announce that publicly, and its vegetation (grass etc.) should not be cut." Al-`Abbas said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! Except Al-Idhkhir, (for it is used by their blacksmiths and for their domestic purposes)." So, the Prophet said, "Except Al-Idhkhir."

This statement from Muhammad was made AFTER the conquest of Mecca. As we can see here, offensive combat was meant to be for all time until the end of the world. Of course, the end hasn't happened, so this religion still wants them to hurt and oppress people through violent subjugation. And if people are leaving, they won't be able to help this tyrannical, totalitarianistic force get a power grab on the world. Islam works like a dishonest corporation.

We have seen the results of this command. Naive individuals have gone out to join such combat forces. These include Al-Qaeda, DAESH (ISIL), and many others.

4. Islam condones beheadings: This one has likely been heard of among many people. The reality, is that the Quran DOES contain verses about beheading. In verse 47:4, we read "When you encounter those who disbelieve, strike at their necks. Then, when you have routed them, bind them (the surviving prisoners) firmly. Then, either release them by grace, or by ransom, until war lays down its burdens. Had Allah willed, He could have defeated them Himself, but He thus tests some of you by means of others. As for those who are killed in the way of Allah, He will not let their deeds go to waste."

This verse orders the adherents of Islam to behead some of the disbelievers and take others prisoner. The only "peaceful" part of this verse, was the part about "release them by grace". Even then, that's after they were already violently captured, and it still leaves room for a ransom (Islam wants that money).

5. Islam spread by the sword: Islam wasn't spread peacefully. The first of the four major caliphates was the Rashidun Caliphate. The four major caliphates were established after the death of Muhammad in 632 AD, and they served as his successors. The first of the caliphs (leaders) was Abu Bakr (632-634), followed by Omar (634-644), then Uthman (644-656), and finally Ali (656-661).

The Rashidun expanded rapidly in the 25 years that it terrorized entire populations of innocent who didn't want to buy into their ways. They reached their peak of 100,000 jihadis. Of course, they got this many fighters through strategic deceit and force. This will be for another article, but let's continue.

The bloodbath and violence successfully subjugated the Levant of the Arabian Peninsula. The Levant included the Transcaucasus in the north, North Africa, Egypt, Tunisia, the Iranian Plateau, parts of Central Asia, and South Asia, all violently invaded in the span of 25 years. Lots of lives were lost. A jihadi may get excited and say "Allah was with them!", and they would be wrong. The Quran is supposed to be perfect and infallible, but there's a self-defeating passage in the Quran where the so-called all-knowing Allah is rambling.

Jihadis love this verse: [Quran 9:29] "Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, nor abide by the religion of truth—from among those who received the Scripture—until they pay the due tax, willingly or unwillingly."

But they won't like the ironic and self-defeating verse that follows: [Quran 9:30] "The Jews say, "Ezra is the son of Allah," and the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah." These are their statements, out of their mouths. They emulate the statements of those who blasphemed before. May Allah assail them! How deceived they are!"

Before any apologists try to tell us about the group of Jews that supposedly worshipped Ezra back in those days, that cover-up already got refuted. Check out our article titled "The Quran's Major Error Regarding Jewish Belief" at https://freefromreligiousharm.jimdofree.com/the-quran-s-major-error-regarding-jewish-belief/

The Quran ordered the violent subjugation of people that it doesn't even properly know. One mistake renders the entire book invalid, and this error is indisputable and leaves the Quran beyond recovery. It is not worth killing over.

(Just a disclaimer: This is not to show favoritism to Judaism or the Bible, as this website already has articles refuting the Bible along with Judaism and Christianity. This website refutes the Bible peacefully with solid evidence, while the Quran orders violence without even knowing what it's talking about.)

All that aside, that's what took place in the first 25 years that Islam spread violently. The violence didn't stop, though. After all, they were ordered to fight for all time until the end of the world. In order to not make this article too long, it'll stay as that. Feel free to do some independent research on the full history of Islam's violent spread.

A lot of innocent people died unjustly during Islam's bloody history. No matter what, apologists are going to try to cover for these clear things. It only takes a rational mind and a willingness to research to see past the apologists.

6. Former Muslim women may have had their genitals cut (full discussion on this topic will be for another article): Female genital mutilation is a widely spoken topic around the world. A lot of women who went through it are resentful. A lot of women who are former adherents of Islam were cut and they wish they weren't. What says Islam about this? A lot of apologists will try to say that Islam doesn't support it. Let's take a look at the sources.

The hadith Jami' at-Tirmidhi 108 says "Aishah narrated: 'When the circumcised meets the circumcised, then indeed Ghusl is required. Myself and Allah's Messenger did that, so we performed Ghusl." (Just as a side note, Muhammad married Aisha when she was a child.)

When we read this Hadith we see something here. Aisha was circumcised, meaning that her genitals were cut. Some apologists will try to say Islam didn't cause it. And yes, it did. Muhammad witnessed it happening one time and did nothing about it. In the Hadith Abu Dawud 5271, we read: "A woman used to perform [female] circumcision in Medina. The Prophet said to her: Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband." Apologists will try to throw this because, as it stands, this Hadith is disputable. However, from the other quoted Hadith, we already know that it's still an Islamic practice. If we remove the disputable Hadith, there won't be any restrictions on how much is cut (although none should be cut, realistically speaking).

We already know it happened to Aisha. Muhammad even gave a ruling on when "circumcised meets the circumcised", indicating that women who follow Islam are cut. Muhammad didn't say when the private meets the private. Instead, he said when the circumcised meets the circumcised, indicating that it's expected. It left no room for a lack of it. Furthermore, there are no Hadiths condemning it nor putting it into a category of being disliked.

A future article will discuss female genital mutilation as a solo topic to refute the apologists who try to defend it.

7. Former Muslim men may have been circumcised at a younger age (full discussion on this topic will be for another article): Most can agree that Islam prescribes circumcision for men. It's not even up for debate. Going back to the Hadith's statement "when the circumcised meets the circumcised", it's clear that there was no room for a lack of it. We read in the Sahih Al-Bukhari 5889: "Narrated Abu Huraira: 'Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Five practices are characteristics of the Fitra: circumcision, shaving the pubic region, clipping the nails and cutting the moustaches short."

There are former Muslim men who were circumcised under Islamic law, not as an adult, but as a child. Many of them are resentful and wish they hadn't been. We read in Sahih Al-Bukhari 6299: "Narrated Said bin Jubair: 'Ibn 'Abbas was asked, "How old were you when the Prophet died?" He replied. "At that time I had been circumcised." At that time, people did not circumcise the boys till they attained the age of puberty. Sa'id bin Jubair said, "Ibn 'Abbas said, 'When the Prophet died, I had already been circumcised."

As we can see here, he was still a minor when he was cut. They were doing it to young boys who had just reached puberty. They didn't give them the choice. Many former Muslim men went through it, and many of them are resentful. It is our hope that this article will help them to speak about it and not push it down because of society's norms.

A future article will address male circumcision as a solo topic.

8. Child marriage took place in Islam: Reading the Islamic sources, we can see that Muhammad married Aisha when she was a child. We read in the Hadith Sahih Muslim 1422: "A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: 'Allah's Apostle married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old."

Muhammad married Aisha at the age of 6. She was admitted to his house at the age of 9. From what we see here, this man was a pedophile, a violent, self-absorbed pedophile. It gets worse, though. Apologists for Islam will try to deny that sexual intercourse was involved in this. The Quran itself refutes their cover-up. Let's first take a look at 65:4 in the Quran: "As for those of your women who have reached menopause, if you have any doubts, their term shall be three months—and also for those who have not menstruated (i.e. they are immature). As for those who are pregnant, their term shall be until they have delivered. Whoever fears Allah—He will make things easy for him."

So there's the part about the marriage and the divorce, as the passage where this verse is located was talking about the divorce and the waiting period before separating from the divorced one. Now we get to the part where adult men having sexual intercourse with a little girl before she reaches puberty is strictly Islamic.

We read in 33:49 of the Quran: "O you who believe! When you marry believing women, but then divorce them before you have touched them, there is no waiting period for you to observe in respect to them; but compensate them, and release them in a graceful manner."

This is indisputable. As we see, there is no waiting period if the man doesn't have sexual intercourse with her. However, 33:49 gives a waiting period for the prepubescent girl. What does that mean? It can only mean one thing: The Quran condones and endorses the act of a man violating a young girl and taking away her childhood innocence before she even reaches puberty. This act is deplorable and has no place in the world. Children need their childhood innocence. They don't need a world influenced by a religious book that puts them at risk of being forced into adult situations.

9. Islam condones spousal abuse from husbands toward their wives: There are a lot of cases where male adherents of Islam abuse their wives, often very brutally. Despite what apologists will try to say, this is rooted in Islam's teachings.

We read in 4:34 of the Quran: "Men are in charge of women, as Allah has given one of them an advantage over the other, and because they spend out of their wealth. The good women are obedient, guarding what Allah would have them guard. As for those from whom you fear disloyalty, admonish them, and abandon them from their beds, then strike them. But if they obey you, seek no way against them. Allah is Sublime, Great."

This verse gives three stages for husbands to force their wives to obey him (even if he's being an idiot at the time). Upon first offense, he is told to warn her not to disobey him again, to be a good woman and obey. If she still doesn't put up with his stupidity, he's told to send her away from the bed (the old "go sleep on the couch"). After that, he's told to hit her.

Anyone who truly loves their spouse won't hit them, but Islam doesn't care about love. It's all about sex and business transactions via marriage in Islam. The woman obeys the husband and gives him sex whenever he wants it in exchange for financial stability. Love isn't important in Islam.

Apologists will try to say that the Quran only meant a light beating as a symbolic way of getting her to obey. Of course, this is a false cover-up. Muhammad, the role model of Islam, showed an example. We read in Sahih Al-Bukhari 5825: "Narrated `Ikrima: 'Rifa`a divorced his wife whereupon `AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. `Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah's Messenger came, `Aisha said, **"I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women**. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!" When `AbdurRahman heard that his wife had gone to the Prophet, he came with his two sons from another wife. She said, "By Allah! I have done no wrong to him but he is impotent and is as useless to me as this," holding and showing the fringe of her garment, `Abdur-Rahman said, "By Allah, O Allah's Messenger! She has told a lie! I am very strong and can satisfy her but she is disobedient and wants to go back to Rifa`a." Allah's Messenger said, to her, "If that is your intention, then know that it is unlawful for you to remarry Rifa`a unless `Abdur-Rahman has had sexual intercourse with you." Then the Prophet saw two boys with `Abdur- Rahman and asked (him), "Are these your sons?" On that `AbdurRahman said, "Yes." The Prophet said, "You claim what you claim (i.e.. that he is impotent)? But by Allah, these boys resemble him as a crow resembles a crow,"

In this hadith, Aisha said she has never seen anyone suffer as much as the believing women, the women adhering to Islam. The lady being spoken about had divorced one man and married another man. Her new husband beat her until her skin turned green. Instead of condemning it, Muhammad said nothing to him, and instead used his two sons who he had from another woman to defend him.

Muhammad didn't rebuke the man at all! He defended him! In fact, he set a trap for the lady. She wanted to marry her former husband, but Muhammad said she couldn't unless she has had intercourse with her newer husband. This left her between a rock and a hard place. Aside from this, we can see that she wanted to leave one bad marriage to return to another. Had it not been for Islamic conditioning, she would have realized that she deserved better than both.

But, Muhammad's teachings already had her believing she needed to depend on men she wasn't interested in, which is what caused her to get into an abusive marriage and then want to return to the man she had previously divorced. Islam doesn't allow women to set boundaries, so that's out of the window.

What else can we see in this hadith? She claimed he was impotent (unable to have sexual intercourse), but the man had two sons, indicating that wasn't true. Apologists will now start sweating less and say "ah! She lied then!" as their heartbeat is still up.

Not so fast! There's a reason she did that! Islam allows men to beat their wives for disobedience, including if they refuse to have sex with their husbands. She wouldn't have been able to do the divorce under the complaint that her husband was beating her severely for not having sexual intercourse with him. We read in 2:223 of the Quran: "Your women are cultivation for you; so approach your cultivation whenever you like, and send ahead for yourselves. And fear Allah, and know that you will meet Him. And give good news to the believers."

Calling him impotent was her best bet to get away from him. But, even that didn't work. Could it be that he was trying to force her to have sex one night, she didn't want to, and he started beating her? After all, Islam places women to being sex vessels for their husbands, and men are allowed to beat their wives for refusing. It's understandable why she would want to get away from that man.

10. Islam condones sex slavery: In the many passages of violence and absurd commands in the Quran, male adherents of Islam are allowed to own sex slaves.

We read in the Quran, chapter 4, verses 23-24: "Forbidden for you are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your paternal aunts, your maternal aunts, your brother's daughters, your sister's daughters, your foster-mothers who nursed you, your sisters through nursing, your wives' mothers, and your stepdaughters in your guardianship—born of wives you have gone into—but if you have not gone into them, there is no blame on you. And the wives of your genetic sons, and marrying two sisters simultaneously. Except what is past. Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. And all married women, **except those you rightfully possess**. This is Allah's decree, binding upon you. Permitted for you are those that lie outside these limits, provided you seek them in legal marriage, with gifts from your property, seeking wedlock, not prostitution. If you wish to enjoy them, then give them their dowry—a legal obligation. You commit no error by agreeing to any change to the dowry. Allah is All-Knowing, Most Wise."

These two verses were speaking in regard to marriage, who a Muslim man is not allowed to marry. In this the Quran mentioned married women, but it gave an exception for "those you rightfully possess". How is this not a command from a perverted human being rather than a supposed all-knowing creator.

An example of adherents of Islam taking sex slaves is found in Sahih Al-Bukhari 371. It's a long hadith, so I'll only quote part of it: ".......We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and said, 'O Allah's Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.' The Prophet said, 'Go and take any slave girl.' He took Safiya bint Huyai. A man came to the Prophet and said, 'O Allah's Messenger! You gave Safiya bint Huyai to Dihya and she is the chief mistress of the tribes of Quraidha and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.' So the Prophet said, 'Bring him along with her.' So Dihya came with her and when the Prophet saw her, he said to Dihya, 'Take any slave girl other than her from the captives.' Anas added: The Prophet then manumitted her and married her........."

Looks like Muhammad wanted that first captive for himself! This hadith is in reference to when they violently invaded Khaibar. They killed the men and took the women captive. But what about 4:23-24 of the Quran? What was its background? The answer to that is in Sahih Muslim 1456: "Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: 'And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (4:24)" (i.e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end)."

From this, we can see that sex slavery is 100% in Islam. Muhammad and the Quran both condoned and endorsed it. Imagine if your town was invaded and your loved ones who are female were taken captive by a group of perverted pedophilic barbaric men. That's basically what took place in the Islamic sources. We still see these things happening today.

There you have it. Those are 10 reasons why people hate the Islamic religion. Keep in mind, Free From Religious Harm does not condone hating people. Therefore, we do not condone hating Muslims. Rather our hate is upon the religion itself, the ideology, the actions that the religion has caused.

It is our hope to bring more people into the light and put a stop to the bad things that are happening because of this fake ideology. The Quran and the Hadiths are filled with dark histories that have no place in the world. Meanwhile, these things still happen to this very day. All the while, the Quran is also filled with errors that could not come from an all-knowing creator. In the end, Islam is not worth it. It's not worth the atrocities listed in this article.